January 2026 Follow-Up: ARNA’s Ministerial Congress Dissolution Renews Attention on June 2025 Warning Issued by Xi-Amaru Republic

Public Affairs Desk – Aboriginal Ministry of Justice (Xi-Amaru Republic)

January 2026

The Aboriginal Ministry of Justice (AMJ) issues this follow-up report in light of the executive decree released on January 6, 2026, by the Aboriginal Republic of North America (ARNA), formally dissolving its Ministerial Congress and announcing legal action against its former head, Bolon Xi-Amaru, and other parties.

This development has renewed public attention on the closed meeting held on June 4, 2025, in the Xi-Amaru Republic, during which Chief Nnakina Xi-Amaru Fears delivered what was described as a final warning and judgment concerning ARNA’s leadership, moral standing, and institutional future.

AMJ reiterates that it is not affiliated with ARNA’s government and publishes this report as a third-party Indigenous justice institution documenting matters of regional and cultural significance.

January 2026 developments in ARNA

According to ARNA’s public decree, its Ministerial Congress has been suspended for three months under constitutional authority following:

• The resignation and expatriation of former Ministerial Congress head Bolon Xi-Amaru
• Allegations of constitutional violations and sedition
• Temporary consolidation of legislative authority within the executive office
• Initiation of legal proceedings
• Plans for a national referendum to restructure or permanently dissolve the legislative body

   

ARNA officials stated that Mr. Xi-Amaru is no longer recognized as a member of congress or a national and that continued actions taken after resignation were treated as unlawful.

These actions represent the most significant institutional breakdown within ARNA since its formation.

June 2025 meeting revisited

On June 4, 2025, Chief Nnakina Xi-Amaru Fears convened a private session in the Xi-Amaru Republic attended by nationals and citizens.

During that address, she warned that ARNA’s leadership had entered a period of judgment due to:

• Abuse of authority
• Betrayal of Indigenous allies
• Defamation and internal conspiracy
• Corruption among appointed leadership
• Silence from those who witnessed wrongdoing
• The blending of political authority with spiritual deception

   

She further stated that ARNA’s governing influence would be removed and its institutions dismantled if repentance did not occur.

Her closing declaration asserted that ARNA’s authority had already been revoked spiritually and would soon collapse publicly if moral order was not restored.

Alignment between warning and outcome

With the January 2026 dissolution now public record, AMJ observes that several outcomes described in the June 2025 address have since materialized:

• Loss of centralized leadership
• Fragmentation of legislative authority
• Legal conflict among former officials
• Institutional suspension
• Exposure of internal disputes
• Competing claims of legitimacy
• National identity conflict centered on heritage and authority

   

While ARNA describes these changes as constitutional governance, the Xi-Amaru Republic views the sequence of events as evidence that moral accountability precedes political authority.

“God’s word does not return void”

The Xi-Amaru Republic grounds its interpretation of these developments in both Indigenous moral law and biblical scripture.

Chief Nnakina Xi-Amaru Fears cited the principle recorded in Isaiah 55:11:

“So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.”

From this perspective, the unfolding events within ARNA are viewed not as coincidence, but as fulfillment of a warning previously issued.

Leadership within the Xi-Amaru Republic maintains that judgment often manifests through exposure and internal collapse, rather than external force—when institutions fracture, authority is contested, and hidden divisions surface publicly.

Heritage and internal conflict

Observers continue to note that ARNA’s crisis is inseparable from long-standing disputes over lineage, Indigenous legitimacy, and jurisdictional authority.

Over time, heritage—rather than uniting leadership—became politicized, generating rivalry and exclusion that weakened institutional trust and governance.

AMJ emphasizes that when identity becomes a mechanism of power rather than stewardship, nations frequently destabilize from within.

Closing statement

The Aboriginal Ministry of Justice publishes this report as part of its responsibility to document matters affecting Indigenous governance and justice.

The dissolution of ARNA’s Ministerial Congress stands as a rare and visible example of how swiftly authority can erode when moral foundations collapse.

For the Xi-Amaru Republic, the events affirm a long-held principle: that truth does not fail, that moral law precedes political legitimacy, and that no constitution can preserve institutions where integrity has been abandoned.

As Chief Nnakina Xi-Amaru Fears stated in 2025, judgment may be delayed, but it is never absent.